Skip to main content

Lateral Scapular Test

 

From previous statics postural assessment, it can be observed that the client presents scapulae dyskinesis (scapula protracts and upward rotates, scapulae wing on the right side (Figure1) (Johnson, 2012). Dyskinesis is a prominence in any portion of the medial scapular border or inferior angle that is separated from the thorax due to excessive anterior tilting of the inferior angle (McClure et al., 2012) as a consequence of kyphotic sitting posture (Johnson, 2012).  The client scapula are 4 inches away from the spine, which means weakness in serratus anterior  and upper and lower trapezius. Scapular upward rotation suggest tension in the rhomboid major, serratus anterior lower trapezius (Jonhson, 2012) by a force couple between the upper and lower trapezius and the serratus anterior (McClure et al., 2012). As a result of this, it was decided to further test client’s scapulas by carrying out Lateral Scapular Slide Test (Hippensteel et al.,  2018).

Lateral Scapular Slide Test

The lateral scapular slide test (LSST) (Figure 20) examines the scapular muscle strength by measuring scapular symmetry in various positions (Shadmehr et al., 2010). This test will evaluate the position of the bilateral inferomedial scapular border position in relation to the nearest spinous process, with arm relaxed, hands placed akimbo, and arms elevated at 90° with glenohumeral internal rotation (Hippensteel et al.,  2018) (Figure, 2). A difference of =/> of 1.5cm is consider a positive finding (Tate et al., 2009). Additionally, Kibler (1991), reported that a difference higher of 1.5cm were associated with shoulder lessons, pain, decreased shoulder function. However, findings must be interpreted with caution as it was difficult to identify the inferior angle of the scapula. The client’ screening resulted  positive as there was a difference of >1.5 cm in two of the three positions (see in Table 1).  

Furthermore, as seen in figure 1, it can be observed that the client right shoulder drops. Burkhart et al., reported that is commonly observed scapular winging and shoulder drop on the affected area.

Exist contradictory finding in regards to the reliability and validity of LSST.
Gibson et al., (1995) found aacceptable intra-rater reliablity (poor inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.18-0.69), whirlst Park et al., (2017), reported a moderate to excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.72- 0.84; ICC: 0.918- 0.968).



             Figure 1. Posterior static view of participant where scapular wing can be observed.


Figure 2. Posterior static view of participant where scapular wing can be observed.


A scapular kinematic alterations have been demonstrated in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome, due to  there is a correlation between increased scapular internal rotation, increased scapular posterior inclination, and decreased scapular upward rotation (Ludewig and Cook, 2000). It is believed that these scapular motion alterations reduce the subacromial space by failing to move the acromion away from the humeral head during arm elevation, resulting in increased compressive stresses on the rotator cuff tendons or long head of the biceps muscle (Borstad, 2006; Lucado 2011). 

Tightness of the short head of the biceps or the pectoralis minor through their attachment on the coracoid process can induce internal rotation and anterior tilting of the scapula, which can inhibit scapular upward rotation (Neumann, 2010; Sahrman, 2002). In contrast, the lower stabilisers of the scapula, including the serratus anterior, rhomboids, middle, and lower trapezius are inhibited (Lucado, 2011).

 

 Table 1. Results obtained in the LSST.

Position

Right

 Left

Arms Relaxed

 10 cm

11.5 cm

Hands in akimbo

 9.5 cm

10.5 cm

Arms extended and Internal rotated

 9.5 cm

11 cm

 

Table 2. Results obtained in the LSST.

Tight Muscles

 Weak muscles

Pectoralis minor

Serratus Anterior

Short head of biceps

Lower trapezius

 

Middle trapezius

 

Rhomboids

 

 

 References:

Borstad, J. D. (2006) ‘Resting position variables at the shoulder: Evidence to support a posture-impairment association.’ Physical Therapy, 86(4)’ pp. 549–557.

Burkhart, S.S., Morgan, C.D. and Kibler, W.B., (2003). ‘The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology Part III: The SICK scapula, scapular dyskinesis, the kinetic chain, and rehabilitation.’ Arthroscopy, 19(6), pp.641-661.

Gibson, M.H., Goebel, G.V., Jordan TM, et al.: A reliability study of measurement techniques to determine static scapular position. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1995, 21: 100–106.

Hippensteel, K. J., Brophy, R., Smith, M. V., & Wright, R. W. (2018) ‘A Comprehensive Review of Physical Examination Tests of the Cervical Spine, Scapula, and Rotator Cuff.’ Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1.

Johnson, J. (2012) Postural assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Lucado, A. M. (2011) ‘Scapular muscle imbalance: Implications for shoulder pain and pathology.’ Physical Therapy Reviews, 16(5) pp. 356–364.

Ludewig, P.M., and Cook, T.M. (2000) ‘Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement.’ Physical Therapy, 80, pp. 276 –291.

McClure, P., Greenberg, E. and Kareha, S. (2012) ‘Evaluation and management of Scapular dysfunction.’ Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, 20(1), pp. 39–48.
Neumann, D. (2010) Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: foundations for rehabilitation. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.

Park, S.-Y. (2017) ‘Interrater reliability and intrarater reliability of lateral scapular slide tests of females in their 20s.’  Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 29(4), pp. 726–728.

Sahrmann, S.A. (2002) Does postural assessment contribute to patient care? Journal Orthopaedics  Sports Physical Therapy, 32, ppp.376 –379.

Tate, A.R., McClure, P., Kareha, S., Irwin, D., and Barbe, M.F. (2009) ‘A clinical method for identifying scapular dyskinesis, part 2: Validity.’ Journal  Athletic Training, 44, pp.165-173.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion (ROM) Tests

  In the previous blog it was observed that the client OHS and SLS, ankle dysfunctions such us eversion. However, the OHS assessment provided limited results therefore to further investigate it was decided to use a goniometer to assess the clients talocrural dorsiflexion mobility ad reduced ROM are related to ankle fractures and sprains ( Hancock  et al., 2005; Collins et al., 2005). There are several methods to measure ROM ankle dorsiflexion, in both weight-bearing (WB) and non-weight-bearing position. Research has reported that weight-bearing tests are more reliable than non-weight-bearing (NWB) assessment (ICC=0.93-0.96 vs   0.32-0.72) (Venturini et al., 2006). Disparities could be caused due to ROM values can be affected by the testing position (knee flexion or extension, WB, NWB position (Norkin and White, 2016). Norkin and White (2016), reported that dorsiflexion is usually lower with the knee extended because of shortened gastrocnemius limit ankle dorsi...

Gait Analysis

  Based on the previous client's postural assessment, in which issues related to muscles imbalances, ROM, flexibility and a possible scoliosis were found, it has been decided to perform a gait analysis. Gait analysis allows to study the human walking and helps to detect abnormalities in the locomotor ( Akhtaruzzaman et al., 2016 ) and provide information for diagnosis, assessment, monitoring and predicting injuries (Mirelman et al., 2018). It is also another option to identify lower back pain (LBP), as individuals suffering LBP will experience difficulties in walking/ running, walk slower, and will experience fatigue in earlier stages and will walk with excessive APT compared to healthy individuals (Arjunan et al., 2010; Vismara et al., 2009). The advantage of using observational gait analysis is its simplicity. Its reliability and validity depend on the examiner experience and proficiency ( Gor-García-Foged, 2016). Krogt et al (2019) reported high inter-rater reliability (ICC...